Shifting the Paradigm from Deficit Oriented Schools to Asset Based Models Main Argument

 Shifting the Paradigm from Deficit Oriented Schools to Asset Based Models is an article written by Shannon Renkly and co-written by Katherine Bertolini under the research for South Dakota State University. In the article there are two paradigms that Renkly and Bertonlini bring light to which is a "Deficit base model" and a "Asset base model" that school fall into. The focus of a deficit model is on the things that students are unable to do.  When a student is performing below expectations, individuals who utilize a deficit model assume that the student is not trying hard enough. Conversely, an asset model, emphasizes a student's abilities and play into their strengths. The asset model fosters each student's success by maintaining an educational program and school culture that support learning via cooperation, trust, and a customized learning environment with high standards for each student.

The main point that Shannon Renkly and Katherine Bertolini are relaying to us is that schools should focus on what students are capable of and help them nurture their potential in any skill they are natural at through the Asset based education model. Renkly and Bertonlini provided an example on how Asset based education can help build healthy Communities with a common commitment are conducive to the health of children and adolescents.  They stand out as relational and intergenerational spaces that prioritize boundaries, empowerment, and support. 

Reflection/Question/Comments To Share:

I like to share a thought I had on the Asset Based Model, and I want to comment that the Asset model would help greatly for neurodivergent students. With the Asset model, neurodivergent students would be seen students that have much improvements that need to be catered too and assisted. While the Deficit model would most likely label the student as "falling behind" and likely be hold from progressing to a further grade or level.